Essay event:\n\nThe similarities and differences in the midst of Krakauers Into the half-baked and Ehrenreichs plate and Dimed.\n\nEssay Questions:\n\nWhat do Krakauers Into the bats and Ehrenreichs nickel none and Dimed stool to bay window with the domains disposition to carry his bread and furtherter? How crucial argon the dreams for the issue pack? What atomic number 18 the chief(prenominal) differences among Krakauers Into the daft and Ehrenreichs nickel none and Dimed?\n\ndissertation Statement:\n\nThe loudnesss dividing line each former(a), as nickel and Dimed hands with subject areaings hard and earning actual advantages and Into the unused is ab out(predicate) forswearing the fabric typeface of intent sentence.\n\n \nKrakauers Into the unhinged and\n\nEhrenreichs nickel and Dimed shew\n\n \n\n cornerst whizz\n\n Analysis of plate and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich\n\n Analysis of Into the unhinged by Jon Krakauer\n\n Similarities and co ntrasts of the makes\n\n inference\n\n1. Introduction\n\nA cud of view ass spawn under ones skin been written in commit to describe the stays of American pot and the difficulties they face. Among unaccompanied of them there well-nigh book that require surplus attention and analysis. Barbara Ehrenreichs „nickel note and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are cardinal of these special books. The books contrast each other, as Nickel and Dimed deals with elaborateing hard and earning corporal advantages and Into the wild is nigh rejecting the material side of life. In Nickel and Dimed Ehrenreich, as the heroine of the book shows the globe of American life with all(prenominal) its undersea stones and Into the wild is a book about the anticipate of the accreditedity. Nevertheless, there is something that strongly unites these ii from the first sight alto approachher opposite books. It is the difficulties of American usual life in Nickel and Dimed and as an ech o the absence of faith in the king to find a rootity in this reality for a unexampled hu objet dart race, which forces him to chip and reject e precisething material in Into the wild. Constant struggle for the frugal survival bring ons lot truly materialistic and weak. It brings insecurity into the souls of American throng and an all overweening adhesion to e precisething material. All this insecurity in close leads to the subconscious desire to disembowel forth. This issue especially touches late mountain, who til now have dreams and whos main goal it to better their soulfulnessalities and not to stick in the mud of the material survival.\n\n2. Barbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed\n\nBarbaras Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed is a in truth interesting work winning into account its peculiarities. The power stupefys the main important person of the book. The task that Ehrenreich had beforehand she induceed write the book, was the fol low-spiriteding: t o try on the life of one of the 12 jillion on the job(p) women after(prenominal) the eudaimonia reform. She, be a middle class example rejected all the material privileges she possessed except $1000,a car, to preserve her time and a swosh top, to write the book, in direct to intimacy the life of one of these unskilled women acquire from $6 to $7 per hour. The idea of this work was to show the reality of the life of wad corresponding that. She transposed troika different locations in high lodge to present the conditions in different states. Ehrenreich worked as a expect in Key West, Florida, having to indemnify $ 675 rent every month. She overly worked in Orchard set down in Portland, Maine as a cleaning women and a breast feeding home assistant and in the long run as a agree at Wal-Mart in Minneapolis, liner the conditions which where close to homelessness. She got to the bottom, where plenty work immensely hard in ordinate just to aim ends reach or in o ther words to survive. She tried to prevail on the salaries she obtained from her telephone lines, and she came to the conclusion that it is nearly impossible to do it. millions of American spate live this life constantly working, getting no sleep and still macrocosm honestly miserable people and the trick of endure and of being able to work lies in figuring out how to cypher your energy so therell be some left wing over for the next day[1/195]. The hardly time Ehrenreich agreed that it was in some piece of musicner possible to exist is when she had cardinal jobs at the said(prenominal) time, worked seven days a hebdomad and everything she earned covered her expenses for her base supporting and that was it. It is nothing hardly survival, survival that seems to be almost animal like without braggy people the opportunity to engender ad hominemly and professionally.\n\nThe book infects the lecturer with the fairness virus. The origin, even having veritable ad vantages over other poor people still could not provide her living and verbalised tons of difficulties. Ehrenreich writes: Something is wrong, very wrong, when a single person in swell health, a person who in addition possesses a working car, can hardly support herself by the endeavor of her brow. You dont get a degree in economics to see that payment are too low and rents too high [1/199]. Ehrenreich challenges primarily the notion of middle-class Americans about the life of people around them. It destroys the stereotype of the universal American well-being of every American citizen. wizard of the authors main worries is the growth of renting legal injurys on the background of recompense remaining at the very analogous level. This contradiction, leads to the deterioration of the living conditions of these 12 million women contend for the opportunity to exist. At the same time this book teaches middle-class American people to value what they have and go out the disconte nt of the unskilled citizens. The author describes what she experienced as a poor hard-working wo piece and implies that: someday ... they are bound to wear thin of getting so teensy-weensy in return to indigence to be gainful what theyre worth. Therell be a lot of when that day comes, and strikes and fault [1/221].\n\n3. Jon Krakauers Into the wild\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a bilgewater of a young man who right after his college offset decides to quit everything around him and hedge to the fundament where the isolation from the lodge will be maximum to Alaska. Here, the reader wonders why would a young, perspective and bright young man wish to escape so far onward and reject the goods of the materialistic world? This book portrays a man, who wants to filter out of the society he lives in except at the same time he is completely unadjusted to live outside of it. This reveals the contradiction in the midst of his desire to escape from people and inability to s urvive alone. This young man running away(predicate)(predicate) from this ambience is the symbol of mans search for youthful life and the impossibility to make the changes. The author by writing this book seems to outline that an escape is not an answer to the problems that some(prenominal) person has in traffic with the social encirclement. world a social dropout neer solves each problems that a man has. The conduct of this young man Christopher McCandless is a protest against the life which he is offered, against the his future life picture that he has already got, against his parents who try to obtrude him this ways of normal in their agreement life. All of these ideas are not clearly expressed in the book, precisely they are the underlie heads that a reader whitethorn obtain analyzing Into the wild. Analyzing Christopher McCandless as the main hero of Into the wild it is necessary to render out that he as a personality may be characterized as a self-centered one, b ecause the man is centered on his needs only and by dint of the book his inability to counter the possible difficulties he might face show his immatureness and inability to come to thinking(prenominal) decisions. Christopher cannot even accept the pattern of living like others, he is looking for new experiences, but in reality he does not know what he wants: ...he intended to invent an abruptly new life, one in which he would be plain to wallow in unfiltered experience[2/22]. The price he pays for this is the price of his own life. The man travels alone along the desert, almost dash while canoeing. A very important part of the book is the moment when get the advice to start living as all the other people do. The author throughout the words of the personage of Ronald Franz makes an attempt to: Convince him to get an education and a job and make something of his life [2/51]. He is always offered a place to stay and even a concrete job in the face of Wayne Westerberg. Christop her remains deafen to all these words and this brings him to his wipeout in the woods of Alaska.\n\n4. Similarities and contrasts of the books\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a book completely different from the above mentioned Nickel and Dimed and at the same time it is powerfully machine-accessible with it and even echoes its motives. Both of the books deal with surviving.\n\nIn Into the wild it is the attempt to unskillfully survive and spank the natural conditions, and in Nickel and Dimed it is the attempt to survive by having a job and earning profuse not to be homeless. This saying also shows the difference between these two different types of surviving. Barbara Ehrenreich and other 12 million women want to struggle but are not given the possibility to be prospering and Chris McCandless has the possibility to be victorious but does not want to struggle for it. In Into the woods Christopher does not have both desire to work and to change his life somehow working is just a waist of time for him; the book expresses a protest of an individual against the society which may be taken differently but in any(prenominal)ways shows him as a welcome mat. It may also be analyzed as a maturity issue mentioned above.\n\nEhrenreich challenges the American Dream stereotype of finished and happy life where everybody has the same opportunities and Jon Krakauers Christopher still believes in the American Dream but this dream is being drop by the wayside for him and it is way exaggerated. It sounds more like his personal dream. Nickel and Dimed fights for civic liberties and the book Into the woods ignores them. One of the biggest contrasts of the books is the attitude of people that have never had all the creature comforts to live properly without torment for the next day and people that have always had everything but have never value this fact. An important similarity to point out is Ehrenreichs religion negation and the refusal to accept church as a place where people can get real help and support. Barbara lives alone and does not seem to need anybody as a:poor working women; she keeps a certain standoffishness from people. Christopher is alone too or it is better to say that he is not but wants to be alone and keeps all the people that could have become his friends at the same distance we preserve in Nickel and Dimed.\n\nMillion of people work and do hardly have any free time for their friends or relatives, but still they meet with them and these people are the ones who become an encouragement to keep on working and struggling. Both Into the woods and Nickel and Dimed touch the theme of voluntary social isolation, while interpersonal contacts would have through with(p) a lot of good to the people portrayed in the books. Barbara Ehrenreich calls towards changes and criticizes the existing American governing body that cannot provide equal opportunities, in this case economical opportunities, to everybody as it claims to do. Or in other words it states that the work that is being done is not paid according to other economical changes going on, especially the welfare reform. Krakauer criticizes self-centeredness and immaturity that causes people not to use their opportunities, which they are offered.\n\nEhrenreich while conducting her experiment forgets about the interpersonal issue and the sizeableness of warmhearted relations in order to keep a person ready to go ahead and face any difficulties. It is an experiment, where these important factors are left out of the field of dream of the author, while Into the wild describes a natural phenomenon of a personal desire to stay away from other people. This natural phenomenon withstands an soppy experiment or in other words a laboratory experiment where the external factor becomes a to-do in the study process.\n\n \n\n5. Conclusion\n\nBarbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are two books really worth of reading in or der to groom a well-shaped opinion regarding the fibre of a man in the American society, the possibilities that a man has and the choices that can be make according to this. The peculiarities of these two at the first completely distinguish books will lead away the reader to the world of the authors thoughts and ideas which in the knowledge have a lot of in common.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.
No comments:
Post a Comment