Management Power and Change Essay

1 AbstractThe dynamics of advocate traffic and their effects on organizational replace was often underestimated by researchers. Analyses of the give out played by effect in organizational change be increasing in intensity, scale and impact (Munduate and Bennebroeck-Gravenhorst 2003). The appropriate and effective using up of ply is fundamental for managers engaged in major change processes. This constitution deals with the topic of trouble power and change. It focuses on the exercise of power and its function in organizational change. At first power and change management will be defined and then the bases or offsets of power and the responses which ar provoked according to the type of power being applied .how power can be used to influence and facilitate organizational change.2 Definition of index numberThere are many variations to the definition of power and there are dis systems on its definition and what the best way is to throwaway it. The definition also depends on the context in which power is used. In this case, since the report focuses on the explanation of the use of power in the set of organizational change, power is the potential ability to influence behavior, to change the manikin of events, to overcome resistance, and to get people to do things that they would not otherwise do (Pfeffer, 1993 204-5).2.1 Power and InfluenceIn trying to understand how change is achieved, friendly psychologists have used the concepts of social power and influence (Raven 1999) and therefore the basis power and influence are sometimes used synonymously, but there are discrepancies between them. Social power indicates the various tools a individual has to influence the environment or the other party, while influence is referring to the real(a) use of a specific tool in a peculiar(a) situation (Munduate and Medina 2009). According to French and Raven (1959) influence is a effectiveness one someone (the leader or performer) exerts on someone else ( follower or target) to induce a change in the latter, including changes in behaviors, attitudes, and values. Social power was subsequently defined as the potential ability of a person to influence someone else.Basically, influence is the effect a persons actions have on the attitudes, values, beliefs, or behavior of others. Whereas power is the capacity to get to a change in a person, influence may be thought of as the degree of actual change (Daft, 2006 679-680). Boddy defines influence as the process by which one party attempts to modify the behavior of others by mobilizing power resources. Hence, in order to apprehend the function of the change agent in the promotion of change in an organization, the reactions of the targets involving a proactive garbage disposal toward change have to be considered first and then the available tools for the change agent to influence the targets (Munduate and Medina 2009).2.3 Types of Influence ProcessesThere are clear differences in the way fol lowers comply to direct and indirect social squelch from a leader and actually being convinced by him. In one case the influence may just be able to exercise control over the followers behavior, guaranteeing a public agreement no matter if the followers are privately convinced. In other case the influence could be so strong that it changes the followers mentation and merely makes him committed to the leaders request. Consequently, different types of influences have been proposed by social psychologists, whereby the most important was Kelmans distinction (1961) between compliance, internalization, and identification.2.4 Bases of PowerFor a manager to be effective, he has to possess a source of power which he can use to influence employees to take actions or carry out orders which they would not have done in the absence seizure of that power source.